Missions and how we portray the people we serve (Under the Baobab Tree)

Under the Ba0bab Tree points out two possible perspectives of people who do cross-cultural work–changing our perspectives. He is writing about the translation world, but I think it equally applies to missions.

…The first type of person … tells you of the large cultural divide, but he does so in order that you can understand him and the difficulties that he has in his work. He puts you in his shoes.

The second type of person also realises that he is a bridge between you (the listeners) and the community. But unlike the first person he helps you to understand and relate to the community. He tells you of the immense cultural differences, but he does in order to help you to understand and identify with people. He puts you in their shoes.

But I think it goes deeper than just the things we say. The way we talk about people ultimately shows what our perspective is – how we perceive them, and what we believe about them…

The problem for the first person is that he …judges the success of his work, not by how the local people perceive him, but by what his friends “back home” think. He sees his value in the work that he can do and the tasks that he can accomplish before he returns home.

The second person views himself from the perspective of the people he is serving amongst. He doesn’t see them as different, but rather sees himself as different. He respects the local people, and is more aware of the cultural offense he may cause to them than the frustrations he feels. He sees cultural differences not as an obstacle to overcome, but as an opportunity to learn, albeit often very difficult lessons, from people who have a vast amount of wisdom.

He works hard, but realises that the real impact that he will make will be in and through the relationships that he forms within the community, not in the tasks that he completes. He sees himself just as one small part of a bigger picture – a picture that has been developing for hundreds of years, and will continue long after he leaves…

Some people make the transition from the first perspective to the second relatively quickly; others never seem to. Sometimes I feel a bit schizophrenic when I’m trying to present one of my worlds to the other–I find myself being the first person all too often (and the cultural differences of my worlds are meager in comparison to many). This post might help give me a better handle on that, but I know some of my main issues lie in the arrogance of my own heart.

One of the key questions might be, “Where d0 your personal loyalties and affinities lie?” or ‘Where are your closest friends?” One big complication may be that while our heart may be fully engaged in one world, we are depending on a different world (with different agendas and priorities) to pay the bills, and we know where our bread is buttered.

Give the whole post a read–changing our perspectives. Two of my blogging friends who model this second perspective for me are Eddie Arthur and David Ker.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.